Sign Up!

Sign In


Auto-login on future visits

Forgotten your login?

Blog > View > Whose Story is it anyway?

Whose Story is it anyway?

November 02, 2011 04:34 PM Comments - 3

I was being interviewed the other day by Nail Grimes when he asked me a question, the type of question you laugh off, but which sticks into like a arrow and stays there.  First he told me he’d asked many of my old climbing partners, most of who are now Alpine guides, if they’d read my first book Psychovertical, to which they’d all replied “Of course not - it’s all bollocks”.  He asked my what I’d say to this statement.

At first I just laughed it off, and said the usual line about not letting the truth get in the way of a good story etc.  Then I said that these people just didn’t understand the limits of telling and writing a story, and that a blow by blow, line by line, metre by metre account of the truth would take the same time as the bleeding climbs.  A story about a climb is always an amalgamation of events, with minor details (like the truth) being sacrificed in the pursuit of brevity and timing.  What you should end up is a few thousand words that somehow capture the character of the event, an event that is made up of innumerable emotions, actions and images.  Finally, now feeling defensive, I said that these people where just climbing extremists, the people who knew nothing beyond the extreme, the colour, and couldn’t tell stories, and that’s why I make a living doing just that - and they make a living climbing.

But days later that question still sticks in my mind.

Before I even started writing Cold Wars I came up against this, when one of my old partners, who it turns out I shared a pivotal climb (and pivotal chapter in the book), said in no uncertain terms (with expletives), that he didn’t want to be in my book.  This of course created a real dilemma and begged the question who owns the story of a climb?  Was it his to withhold, or mine to do with as I wanted?  It’s something that’s obvious in many climbing tales that a climb is one of two parts, or many parts in a big team, and everyone has a differing view events, and more importantly their place in them.  People are defensive about the parts they play, and although they love to have their heroics captured, their more human - and interesting - actions are harder to take.  In the end I told our story, but just left his name out, and hoped that him being the hero of the piece would make it easier to bare.

Esmond Tresidder  once complained that I made him look like a bumbling idiot, a climber who is now one of our best mountain athletes.  I pointed out that although he was good now, when I asked him to climb the hardest (and unreapeated) route on the North Face of the Droites (and in winter) he was all but a novice (as I remember it we had to buy his first pair of plastic boots to do it).  What I saw in the nineteen year old climber was some real fire and talent, something that was proved with six months when we also climbed a Zenyatta Mondatta (A4) on El Cap together - his first big wall!  Instead of trying to make him look like an overreaching fool, the story was of a climber (me), so desperate to find fulfillment, he was willing to climb with anyone, no matter how foolhardy.  In my eye’s that story is about a defining moment (one of many I’m sure) of a young and amazingly talented alpinist.

The same goes for Rich Cross, who I always poke fun of due to him coming from Doncaster (probably a Hull - Doncaster thing) and his use of the word ‘cock’ and ‘snack wagon’.  No one likes to be made fun of, and maybe the bitterness of being made fun off obscures all the posative things I’ve always said about Rich (well as much as you can for someone from ‘Dony’).

In writing Cold Wars I strived to write the truest account I can of modern Alpine climbing, and Alpine climbers, something that many have been shocked at (it’s not often pretty in the mind of an extremist, something true in all sports).  But at the same time I’ve tried to also show that colour, and the reasons for going back, and the friendships that bind it together - even the love (well man love).

I guess it’s not the criticism of me the writer from ex-partners that hurts, after all it’s only a book, I guess it’s the fact they obviously never knew how much respect I had for them, and these stories are always stories of adventures - and friendship - even if short lived - that we shared.

Cold Wars book tour starts this week

Plug Alert - I'm still trying to raise funds for my daughter's cheerleading squad (Cheermania!) with sales of my hand strength ebook, so if you've got £3 spare than please buy one here.


comments

You must be logged in to leave a comment. Log In | Register



kimgraves pic

kimgraves | 11/02/11

Hi Andy, As you might remember, my wife is a professional writer.  When we were first together she was writing novels and the issue of whether she could use me as a character came up.  As you might imagine I had mixed feelings about how I might be portrayed and so was hesitant about saying yes.  After much soul searching I came to understand that she didn’t need my permission.  Writers can only get their raw material from the world around them.  Writers or actors or artists can only use the information that they have for their work.  You can’t make up something out of nothing.  I had a choice of whether to live with her or not, but if I was going to be part of her life, I was going to be part of her stories.  Knowing that you’re a writer, I would assume any interaction we would have would mean that you could use that experience for one of your stories.  It is irrelevant whether you are a good writer or not or how you might portray me.

November 02, 2011
Dave pic

Dave | 11/02/11

Alrite Andy,

Was that at Alpkit with Grimer? I was there
and was a bit shocked when you said Es was annoyed with his portrayal in Psycovertical. When I read it, I thought he came out of it very well as someone who kept his head during a real epic, and wasn’t afraid to get stuck in at the deep end. I thought it was quite clear how it was intended, as you said, not as a dig at him, but showing how you were so blindly ambitious that you were willing to risk both of your lives.

Similarly in Cold Wars (I take it you’re talking about the walking guide), he comes across as a right hero.

It’s a bit odd that anyone can be annoyed with how you describe them in your books, as the person who you slate the most is yourself! Albeit unjustifyably.

Anyway, I suppose people just have a mental image of themselves and how they are, and to have that challenged (whether right or wrong) or to have an old (and sometimes less perfect) version of themselves described in public can be tough to take for some.

Another reason could be that on a long dangerous climb, you get to see a side of your partner that they wouldn’t share with anyone; their raw fear, joy, inner demons etc. This is a side of most people that they wouldn’t want laid bare, the only reason you get to see it is because you’re in an extreme, often life threatening situation with them. Unfortunately for you, one of the things that makes your books so good, is sharing these raw moments with us, and that ultimately may piss some of your partners off.

At least you’re good at soloing ey!

Dave.

November 02, 2011
DavyWA pic

DavyWA | 11/02/11

Hi Andy,

I no writer as much as I’d like to be but surely the story is all about perception. Your perception of the tale will be different to how others, even ones close you, see it. There is no copyright on memories, you can use them any way you want.

As you say, never let the truth get in the way of a good story.

Keep them coming, Davy

November 02, 2011